Prior Authorization Portal
Enables providers to electronically submit prior authorization requests and view all requests and their statuses

Every prior authorization started with a fax.
Across five markets — Texas, Georgia, Utah, California, Virginia — fax was the only way in. No validation, no real-time data, no status once a request left the desk. Processing stretched up to a month, and internal teams spent hours turning unstructured faxes into actionable records.

Faxing in the world of digital experiences can cause providers and their staff added work, frustration, loss of trust in the company, and more importantly time away from caring for members.
So we asked the people sending them.
Provider interviews on how authorizations actually got done, then usability testing on the digital submission flow to find where it still caught. Both synthesized into empathy maps.
A fax is one flat page. A portal needs a structure.
So I drew the shape of it: what belongs on the dashboard, what belongs inside a request, and what a provider needs to see after they hit submit. Authorization rules came out of clinical ops’ heads and became the form’s own logic.
Status got a place of its own — the one thing a fax could never give back. And the patterns that came out of it were reusable, so the next Bright surface started from a structure instead of a blank page.

They weren't asking for software. They were asking for an answer.
What providers wanted was narrow and specific, and almost none of it was about a better form.
😟 Pains
- Burnout from repetitive admin tasks.
- No visibility into status or timelines.
- Endless back-and-forth with payers.
- Delays hurting patient satisfaction and care.
🌟 Gains
- One system, fully integrated with their EHR.
- Clear approval requirements—less rework.
- Automated status updates and notifications.
- Faster turnarounds, more time for patient care.

The hard part wasn't the form. It was the rules behind it.
I mapped authorization rules into form logic with clinical operations, so the portal could tell a provider what was required before they submitted rather than after. Continuous prototype testing tightened every step of the flow, and an empty-state dashboard grew with the user.

One system. Five markets. White-label from the start.
I partnered with the broader team on a scalable design system with white-labeling support, shipping patterns the team could reuse across other Bright surfaces.
You have Marie Kondo’dthe authorization portal!
Rebecca Schweitz
VP, Clinical Performance

It replaced the fax machine.
Within weeks of go-live in a new market, 15%+ of authorizations had moved to the portal. Providers rated it the best tool they'd used — one team put the saving at four hours per provider, per day.
Savings
$1.9m in savings
Scaled monthly usage to 9-10K a month
Clinical review
$800K in savings
7 minutes per case for clinicians reviewing cases
Time saved
4 Hours per day saved
Went down 4 minutes per authorization, per provider
Users
50K authorization submissions
22K providers logged in
The Team
- Worked with 5–7 engineers, 1 Product Manager, Director of Product, and 1 Content
- Hired and managed 1 designer midway
- Worked with clinical teams to understand their workflows and competitors they have used
Timing
March – July 2021
6 months
Tools Used
Figma
Jira
Confluence
Miro
Pendo
Dovetail
Live Figma prototype
Open prototype ↗Up next — DocSquad